Issue |
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 4, Number 3, 2013
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 163 - 168 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2013057 | |
Published online | 06 March 2014 |
Assessing measurement uncertainty in CMM measurements: comparison of different approaches
Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24,
10129
Torino,
Italy
⋆ Correspondence:
suela.ruffa@polito.it
Received:
5
July
2013
Accepted:
31
October
2013
Manufactured parts are affected by size and form errors, which need to be assessed against geometrical and dimensional tolerances in order to meet the functional requirements they have been conceived for. The compliance assessment of workpieces with specifications depends on measurements and is unavoidably affected by several uncertainty contributions. According to the geometrical product specifications and verification (GPS), measurement uncertainty consists of method and implementation uncertainty. Literature proposes different approaches for the evaluation of implementation uncertainty, however a standardized method has not been yet achieved. This paper makes an analysis of the various elements to be considered when choosing a specific approach: in the implementation uncertainty of circular features. The most common manufacturing signatures affecting circular profiles were considered, together with the number of points necessary for a reliable estimation of implementation uncertainty.
Key words: Uncertainty / geometrical product specification and verification / coordinate measuring machine / roundness / form error
© EDP Sciences 2014
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.