EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 15 (2024) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 15 (2024) 14 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 15, 2024
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 17
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2024010
Published online 13 August 2024
  1. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement — Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Sèvres, France: International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), 2008, BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, JCGM 101:2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html [Google Scholar]
  2. D.V. Lindley, The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and expert systems, Stat. Sci. 17–24 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  3. C.P. Robert, G. Casella, G. Casella, Monte Carlo statistical methods (Springer, 1999), vol. 2 [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Klauenberg, C. Elster, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods: an introductory example, Metrologia 53, S32 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E.T. Jaynes, Information theory and statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. R.E. Kass, L. Wasserman, The selection of prior distributions by formal rules, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91, 1343–1370 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Chaloner, Elicitation of prior distributions, Bayesian Biostat. 141, 156 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. O'Hagan, C.E. Buck, A. Daneshkhah, J.R. Eiser, P.H. Garthwaite, D.J. Jenkinson, J.E. Oakley, T. Rakow, Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts' probabilities (John Wiley & Sons, 2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G.A. Kyriazis, Comparison of GUM Supplement 1 and Bayesian analysis using a simple linear calibration model, Metrologia 45, L9 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Elster, B. Toman, Bayesian uncertainty analysis under prior ignorance of the measurand versus analysis using the Supplement 1 to the Guide: a comparison, Metrologia 46, 261 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Lira, D. Grientschnig, Equivalence of alternative Bayesian procedures for evaluating measurement uncertainty, Metrologia 47, 334 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Forbes, J. Sousa, The GUM, Bayesian inference and the observation and measurement equations, Measurement 44, 1422–1435 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Berger, The case for objective Bayesian analysis, Bayesian Anal. 1, 385–402 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Giaquinto, L. Fabbiano, Examples of S1 coverage intervals with very good and very bad long-run success rate, Metrologia 53, S65 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Wübbeler, C. Elster, On the transferability of the GUM-S1 type A uncertainty, Metrologia 57, 015005 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Marschall, G. Wübbeler, C. Elster, Rejection sampling for Bayesian uncertainty evaluation using the Monte Carlo techniques of GUM-S1,Metrologia 59, 015004 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. O'Hagan, M. Cox, Simple informative prior distributions for Type A uncertainty evaluation in metrology, Metrologia 60, 025003 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Meija, O. Bodnar, A. Possolo, Ode to bayesian methods in metrology, Metrologia 60, 052001 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Evans, N. Hastings, B. Peacock, C. Forbes, Statistical distributions (John Wiley & Sons, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Barnett, Probability plotting methods and order statistics, J. Royal Stat. Soc.: Ser. C (Applied Statistics) 24, 95–108 (1975) [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Wübbeler, M. Marschall, C. Elster, A simple method for Bayesian uncertainty evaluation in linear models, Metrologia 57, 065010 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. EA Laboratory Committee and others, Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration, ” European Co-Operation for Accreditation, Paris, France, ReportNo. EA-4/02 M: 2013 (2013). Available: http://www.european-accreditation.org/publication/ea-4-02-m-rev01-september-2013 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Demeyer, N. Fischer, C. Elster, Guidance on Bayesian uncertainty evaluation for a class of GUM measurement models, Metrologia 58, 014001 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Gelman, J. Carlin, H. Stern, D. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman andS Hall-CRC, 2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. O'Hagan, J. Forster, Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, volume 2B, Bayesian Inference (Arnold, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. A. van der Veen, Bayesian inference in r and rstan, in Good Practice in Evaluating Measurement Uncertainty − Compendium of examples (2021), pp. 21–28. Available: http://empir.npl.co.uk/emue/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2021/07/Compendium_ M36.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Lira, Analysis and comparison of Bayesian methods for type A uncertainty evaluation with prior knowledge, Ukrainian Metrolog. J. 4, 3–6 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Foreman-Mackey, D.W. Hogg, D. Lang, J. Goodman, “emcee: the MCMC hammer,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125, no. 925 (2013) p. 306 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. C.F. Carobbi, M. Cati, L.M. Millanta, Using the log-normal distribution in the statistical treatment of experimental data affected by large dispersion, in 2003 IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No. 03CH37446) 2. IEEE (2003) pp. 812–816 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. W.R. Ott, A physical explanation of the lognormality of pollutant concentrations, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 40, 1378–1383 (1990) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. ISO, 11929: Determination of the Characteristic Limits (Decision Threshold, Detection Limit and Limits of the Confidence Interval) for Measurements of Ionizing Radiation: Fundamentals and Application (International Organization for Standardization, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  32. O. Bodnar, R. Behrens, C. Elster, Bayesian inference for measurements of ionizing radiation under partial information, Metrologia 54, S29 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. O. Bodnar, G. Wübbeler, C. Elster, On the application of Supplement 1 to the GUM to non-linear problems, Metrologia 48, 333 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.