Open Access
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 14, 2023
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 24 August 2023
  1. L.Z. Sun et al., The influence mechanism of undergraduate teaching input of university teachers: the intermediary role of person-organization fit, Front. Psychol. 14, (2023). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141496 [Google Scholar]
  2. W.F. Massy, R. Zemsky, Faculty discretionary time: departments and the “Academic ratchet”, J. Higher Edu. 65, 1–22 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Lin, First-class undergraduate education: cognition problems, essential features and construction path, Tsinghua J. Educ. 40, 22–30 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. J.K. Cheng, Analysis on university faculty workload in U.S. China Higher Educ, Res. 6, 102–107 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  5. K.A. Meyer, Faculty workload studies: perspectives, needs, and future directions. ashe-eric higher education report, vol. 26, no. 1. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC (1998) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Allen, “Faculty workload and productivity in the 1990 s—preliminary findings.” NE/l almanac of higher education (National Education Association, Washington, DC, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  7. L.V. Koos, The adjustment of the teaching load in a university ( Government Printing Office, Washington, 1919) [Google Scholar]
  8. H.E. Yuker, Research: studying faculty workload, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. 7 (8), 48–62 (1975) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y.C. Pei, Y.L. Liu, A preliminary exploration on the faculty workload system in higher education colleges, J. Liaoning University (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed.). 4, 40–43 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Zhao, A study on young faculty's teaching input in local general four-year universities-based on the studies of H University, Master's thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  11. Univ N, and Office of the Chancellor, The university and community college system of nevada. Faculty Workload Study, Fall 1992. Academic Affairs Office of the Chancellor (1993) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.Q. Feng, P. Yang, L. Lin, Investigation and analysis on the faculty teaching input in local colleges and universities, China University Teaching. 12, 68–74 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. H.J. Zhai, An analysis of high-level universities faculty members' undergraduate teaching investment, Chuan cheng yu chuang xin-ti sheng gao deng jiao yu zhi liang, 12, 698–705 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Guo, Y. Yao, Changes in the relationship between teaching and research of faculty in research universities in a decade: based on CAP and APIKS surveys, China Higher Educ. Res. 2, 77–84 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. G.C. Yan, The unbalanced relationship between undergraduate teaching and research in research universities, China Higher Educ. Res. 7, 38–45 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  16. National Center for Education Statistics (Ed), Teaching workload of full-time post secondary faculty. Indicator of the Month (United States Department of Education, Washington, D. C., 1997) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Arimoto et al., The changing academic profession in Japan ( Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S.Q. Qin et al., The analysis and consideration on the workload and productivity data of American University teachers, Higher Educ. Sci. 3, 59-63+74 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. H. E. Yuker, Faculty workload: research, theory, and interpretation, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 10 (Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, D.C., 1984). [Google Scholar]
  20. L.Z. Sun, Research on the faculty members' teaching development in higher education colleges in the field of teaching projects (China Social Sciences Press, Beijing, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Yan, An analysis of high-level universities faculty members' undergraduate teaching investment and its influencing factors, China Higher Educ. Res. 11, 22–27 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. Z.B. Wu, H.Y. Peng, H. Zhu, Survey research on teachers' input of teaching in local applied universities, J. Qilu Normal University. 5, 1–12 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Jonker, H. Martin, Teaching loads and research outputs of Ontario university faculty members: implications for productivity and differentiation (Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, Toronto, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. R.T. Blackburn et al., Faculty at work: focus on teaching, Res. Higher Educ. 32 (4), 363–383 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R.T. Blackburn, C.E. Behymer, D.E. Hall, Research note: correlates of faculty publications, Sociol. Educ. 51 (2), 132–141 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K.A. O' Meara et al., Asked more often: gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them, Am. Educ. Res. J. 54 (6), 1154–1186 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L.J. Guo, The logic and function mechanism of university teachers' choice of teaching behavior: analysis based on the types of teaching management system. University Educ. Sci. 2, 53–61 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  28. X.F. Ma, Philosophical reflection on “Need” in consumption society: from alienation logic to difference logic, Social Sciences in Ningxia. 5, 135–139 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  29. J.M. Zhang, Y.G. Feng, The systematization principle and its practice during the higher education effective governance, Jiangsu Higher Educ. 5, 70–76 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  30. B. Li, Application of PDCA cycle theory in college teaching quality management system, Mod. Educ. Sci. 294 (05), 51–53 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Zhao, L.Y. Chen, The university teaching management process reengineering based on PDCA loop, Mod. Educ. Manag. 299 (02), 76–80 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Bai, D.Y. Fang, Analysis of individual decision behavior under the organizational IS environment, Manag. Rev. 9, 50–54+38 (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.