Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 9, December 2018
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017025
Published online 05 February 2018
  1. A. Jaime, M. Gardoni, D. Vinck, Quality Management, Framework of Knowledge Capitalization at Research Organizations IAMOT 2004 (International Association for Management of Technology, USA, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  2. NF X50-553, Management des activités de recherché (AFNOR, Paris, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Matei, C. Antoni, The new public management within the complexity model, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 109, 1125–1129 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Gruening, Origin and theoretical basis of new public management, Int. Public Manag. J. 4, 1–25 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Spencer, J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, L. Dillon, Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence (National Centre for Social Research, London, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  6. What Are the Standards for Quality Research? Technical Brief Number 9, National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  7. R.J. Shavelson, L. Towne, Quality Research in Education (National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.C. Edmondson, S.E. Mcmanus, Methodological fit in management field research, Acad. Manage. Rev. 32, 1246–1264 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Baker, Quality time. It may not be sexy, but the quality process is becoming a crucial part of lab life, Nature. 529, 456–458 (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. C.G. Begley, A.M. Buchan, U. Dirnagl, Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility, Nature 525, 25–27 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Giesen, Quality management for robust and reliable research, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 6, 407 (2015) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Giesen, Ethical and efficient research management: a new challenge for an old problem, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 6, 406 (2015) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Bareille, B. Baudouin-Massot, M.P. Carreno, S. Fournier, N. Lebret, I. Remy-Jouet, E. Giesen, Preventive actions to avoid questionable research practices. Use of EERM (Ethical and Efficient Research Management) during arrival and departure of a co-worker, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, 10 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. INRA Quality Mission, INRA Quality Guidelines, Version 1. 2003-2005. INRA, contact: qualite[at]inra.fr. [Google Scholar]
  15. ISO 9001, Quality Management Systems − Requirements (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. INRA Quality Mission, INRA Quality Guidelines for Research and Experimental Units (2013), Version 2. INRA Sciences and impact, contact: qualite[at]inra.fr. [Google Scholar]
  17. EN ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (2005) [Google Scholar]
  18. ISO 14001:2015, Environmental Management Systems − Requirements with Guidance for Use (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. NF S96-900, Qualité des centres de ressources biologiques (CRB)-Système de management d'un CRB et qualité des ressources biologiques (AFNOR, Paris, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Belouafa, F. Habti, S. Benhar, B. Belafkih, S. Tayane, S. Hamdouch, A. Bennamara, A. Abourriche, Statistical tools and approaches to validate analytical methods: methodology and practical examples, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, 9 (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Martin, Ch. Baudassé, N. Leménager, M.-F. Thévenon, The metrological approach: a major key factor for the accreditation and continuous improvement of the wood preservation laboratory of Cirad, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 4, 117–120 (2013) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. F.M. Beyer, Language and strategies at work studied through the implementation of quality procedure standards, Sociol. Trav. 41, 235–54 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. ISO 10018, Quality Management–Guidelines on People Involvement and Competence (2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. ISO 10012, Measurement Management Systems–Requirements for Measurement Processes and Measuring Equipment (2003) [Google Scholar]
  25. Guide on equipment qualification: http://www.edqm.eu/en/quality-management-guidelines-86.html. 2015 [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Martin, M.-F. Thévenon, Evaporation as an ageing procedure prior to wood preservative biological testing: when standardization needs metrology, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 5, 405 (2014) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. G. Gomah, A traceable time interval measurement with a reduced uncertainty, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 6, 301 (2015) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. S.B. Amara, J. Dhahri, N.B. Fredj, Control chart limits based on true process capability with consideration of measurement system error, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 7, 401 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. S.F. Beckert, W.S. Paim, Critical analysis of the acceptance criteria used in measurement systems evaluation, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, 23 (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. J.-M. Pou, L. Leblond, Control of customer and supplier risks by the guardband method, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 6, 205 (2015) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Wiederhold, J. Greipel, R. Ottone, R. Schmitt, Clustering of similar processes for the application of statistical process control in small batch and job production, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 7, 404 (2016) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. ISO 8655-1, Piston-operated Volumetric Apparatus-Part 1: Terminology, General Requirements and User Recommendations (2002) [Google Scholar]
  33. ISO 8655-2, Piston-Operated Volumetric Apparatus-Part 2: Piston Pipettes (2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. ISO Guide 30, Reference Materials-Selected Terms and Definitions (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.