EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2017) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 8 (2017) 4 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 8, 2017
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2016020
Published online 15 February 2017
  1. M. Galovska, R. Tutsch, O. Jusko, Data fusion techniques for cylindrical surface measurements, in Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing IX, edited by F. Pavese, M. Bar, J.R. Filtz, A.B. Forbes, L. Pendrill, K. Shirono (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012), pp. 179–186, chapter 22 [Google Scholar]
  2. N.F. Zhang, The uncertainty associated with the weighted mean of measurement data, Metrologia 43, 195–204 (2006) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OILM, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, Technical report (Bureau International de Poids et Mesures (BIPM), 2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Willink, A generalization of the Welch–Satterthwaite formula for use with correlated uncertainty components, Metrologia 44, 340–349 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R.S. Dadson, S.L. Lewis, G.N. Peggs, The pressure balance: theory and practice (HMSO, London, 1982) [Google Scholar]
  6. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OILM, Evaluation of Measurement Data — Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement” — Propagation of Distributions using a Monte Carlo method, Technical report (Bureau International de Poids et Mesures (BIPM), 2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Pitakarnnop, R. Wongpithayadisai, Rarefied gas flow in pressure and vacuum measurements, ACTA Imeko 3(2), 60–63 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N.G. Hadjiconstantinou, Comment on Cercignani's second-order slip coefficient, Phys. Fluids 15(8), 2352–2354 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F.M. White, Viscous fluid flow (McGraw-Hill, 1991), 2nd edition [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Sabuga, Pressure measurements in gas media up to 7.5 MPa for the Boltzmann constant redetermination, in Proceedings of the ‘5th CCM International Conference on Pressure and Vacuum Metrology’ and the ‘4th Internal Conference IMEKO TC16’, edited by K. Jousten (PTB Mitteilungen, 2011), pp. 247–255 [Google Scholar]
  11. P.M. Harris, C.E. Matthews, M.G. Cox, A.B. Forbes, Summarizing the output of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty evaluation, Metrologia 51, 243–252 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Willink, Representing Monte Carlo output distributions for transferability in uncertainty analysis: modelling with quantile functions, Metrologia 46, 154–166 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Elster, B. Toman, Bayesian uncertainty analysis for a regression model versus application of GUM Supplement 1 to the least-squares estimate, Metrologia 48, 233–240 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A.B. Forbes, Approaches to evaluating measurement uncertainty, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 3, 71–77 (2012) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 3rd edition [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Saunders, Propagation of uncertainty for non-linear calibration equations with an application in radiation thermometry, Metrologia 40, 93–101 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. V. Ramnath, Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo measurement uncertainty techniques with application to effective area determination in pressure standards, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 1, 51–57 (2010) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. A.L. Rukhin, Weighted means statistics in interlaboratory studies, Metrologia 46, 323–331 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S.S. Lo, S.K. Loyalka, An efficient computation of near-continuum rarefied gas flows, J. Appl. Math. Phys. 33, 419–424 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Li, L.S. Luo, J. Shen, Accurate solution and approximations of the linearized BGK equation for steady Couette flow, Comput. Fluids 111, 18–32 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Jiang, L.S. Luo, Analysis and accurate numerical solutions of the integral equation derived from the linearized BGKW equation for the steady Couette flow, J. Comput. Phys. 316, 416–434 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Y.W. Yap, J.E. Sader, High accuracy numerical solutions of the Boltzmann Bhatnagar–GrossKrook equation for steady and oscillatory Couette flows, Phys. Fluids 24, 032004-1–032004-18 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  23. J.C. Tannehill, D.A. Anderson, R.H. Pletcher, Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer (Taylor and Francis, 1997), 2nd edition [Google Scholar]
  24. R.V. Lenth, Algorithm AS 243: cumulative distribution function of the non-central t-distribution, J. R. Stat. Soc C: Appl. Stat. 38(1), 185–189 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Hogben, R.S. Pinkham, M.B. Wilk, The moments of the non-central t-distribution, Biometrika 48(3/4), 465–468 (1961) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Van Aubel, W. Gawronski, Analytical properties of noncentral distributions, Appl. Math. Comput. 141, 3–12 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  27. A.J. Macleod, Chebyshev expansions for Abramowitz functions, Appl. Numer. Math. 10, 129–137 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. E.W. Lemmon, R.T. Jacobsen, Viscosity and thermal conductivity equations for nitrogen, oxygen, argon and air, Int. J. Thermophys. 25(1), 21–69 (2004) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.