Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 14, 2023
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2023014
Published online 14 November 2023

© F.d.D. Silva et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2023

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Ceramic tiles are versatile products due to their non-combustibility, ease of cleaning, durability, and mechanical strength [14]. These characteristics allow the use to cover floors and walls, countertops, panels, bathroom, and kitchen sinks, and even furniture [4].

Flatness and thin laying joints are the primary customer requirements [1]. However, some processes are responsible for influencing the dimensional characteristics of ceramic tiles, requiring effective Measurement Systems (MS) for each manufacturing step [35].

Considering that the product is manufactured based on natural raw materials, deviations still occur even with the controls in the process. To ensure quality, a 100% inspection is carried out after firing the tiles and discarding tiles with visual and dimensional defects [5]. Tiles of first quality are also segregated into smaller size ranges (gauges) than tolerances, which is a customer requirement [5,6].

The quality concept of ceramic tiles has evolved, making technical requirements more stringent, including dimensional requirements, which in some cases have been reduced by more than 50% of the normative tolerance [2,7]. The normative Dimensional Measurement System (current MS) evaluates size deviations (length, width, and thickness), orientation tolerance (rectangularity), and shape tolerances of straightness (straightness of sides) and flatness (central curvature, edge curvature, and warpage) [8]. The measurement takes place in a horizontal plane by comparing the ceramic tile with a calibrated standard block in the data dimension measuring device (Fig. 1) [8].

It is important to highlight that the current MS may be obsolete and inadequate to measure the planar characteristics of the large-format, low-thickness ceramic tiles produced today [4,8,9]. In addition, such a system generates measurement and classification problems, the most critical of which is the tile's elastic deformation, which occurs due to its weight, which, with the rigor of the new tolerances, can disapprove good quality tiles.

According to Fazio et al. [9], tiles over 60 cm already suffer deformations during the test, as they are suspended by 3 of their vertices (Fig. 1), affecting the accuracy and precision of the results. However, the Brazil Ceramic Center (CCB)1, in its measurements, identified elastic deformation in tiles of 60 cm or less, with greater intensity in tiles with dimensions close to 60 cm of type BIIb (semi-porous) and with low thickness.

The elastic deformation of the part is considered a source of variation within an MS [9,10]. The holding system and the horizontal position of the measurement of the tiles could cause elastic deformation because this system has significant relevance in terms of repeatability and reproducibility deviations [11].

An MS must operate under stable conditions with proven quality, identifying and eliminating or reducing the sources of variation [10,12,13], so the elastic deformation of the current MS must be studied and mitigated.

Ali and Buajarern [14] proposed to determine the planar characteristics through a Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM), considering the maximum deviations found along several points collected on the diagonals and sides of the tile, because of the deviations are not concentrated in the points defined by the standard [5]. The authors considered only the planar characteristics and used a CMM to perform the measurements of both methods (traditional and proposed), to eliminate the equipment variation, but making it impossible to compare effectively with the traditional method.

Fazio et al. [9] compared all the dimensional characteristics using a data dimension, a conventional CMM and a portable CMM. The authors selected 10 tiles of 3 sizes smaller than 60 cm, inferring that they do not present elastic deformation. The averages of all sides were calculated, that can compensate for some deviations and approximate the values between the methods. The comparative results presented are promising, demonstrating good compatibility between the data dimension and the CMM.

Emam and Sayyed Barzani [15] proposed an alternative to the current laser process control methods, the proposed method uses cameras and algorithms to measure the tiles in the production line. The experiment was carried out in the laboratory and no in-line tests were reported and a comparison with the current method was not performed.

Sioma [16] used cameras integrated with a laser for extraction and analysis of three-dimensional images. The high volume of points collected for measurement allows a careful assessment of flatness, showing vow in the analysis of flatness deviations. The study did not present a method to determine size, lateral straightness and orthogonality and did not compare with the current measurement method.

The above-mentioned studies were developed to propose a more modern, accurate and reliable method [9,1416]. However, studies evaluating quality of measurements and when and how much elastic deformation affects measurement error are still scarce in the literature.

This study aims to analyze the influence of format, thickness, and typology variables on the elastic deformation of the ceramic tile and to determine which products can be measured by the current MS without compromising the quality of the results. This experiment is the first of three parts of a study that will evaluate the compatibility and quality of the current MS with a coordinated MS, to propose a replacement method for the traditional method that proved to be ineffective for larger-format tiles.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Data dimension (Current Measurement System).

2 Material and methods

2.1 Variables of the study

2.1.1 Input variables and samples

In this study, measurements were performed on 16 ceramic tiles (Fig. 2) selected based on their Typologies (Type), Thickness (T), and Size (S), representing the input variables of the experiment. These variables were selected as they are stated on the packaging, enabling laboratories to make methodological decisions without the need for additional tests. Typologies BIa and BIIb were selected because they represent the largest volume produced in Brazil [17]. In addition, these typologies have the lowest porosity and density (BIa) and are the second most porous and least dense (BIIb). Typology BIII (more porous) was not selected due to the low representation in the volumes produced and the difficulty of finding tiles with low thicknesses.

Square tiles of 30 cm, 40 cm, 50 cm, and 60 cm were used according to the measurement range of the lab's current MS and based on previous research [9] and empirical laboratory experience. The thickness was divided into two levels, thin and thick parts. The selection of thin tiles is based on the breaking strength test [18], which establishes that tiles with a thickness ≤ 7.5 mm must be cut into small formats ((20 × 20) cm), to reduce the effect curvature before rupture. The thickest tiles (>9 mm) correspond to the highest thicknesses found in products normally tested by the CCB.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Combination of levels of the input factors.

2.1.2 Output variable

Elastic deformation (Ed) was selected as the study's output variable, which is the difference between the average warping results of ceramic tiles obtained from condition 1 and condition 2. Condition 1 simulates the piece on the data dimension (Fig. 1), placing it on the supports at three vertices and the warping dial indicator at its fourth vertex.

As seen in Figure 3, condition 2 supports the piece on a panel inclined at approximately 81° with adjustable support pins to prevent the piece from moving during the measurement.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Vertical panel.

2.2 Measurement

The measurement was performed using a portable CMM, the measuring arm (Arm), and model Edge FaroArm® equipped with Laser, which will be calibrated before the measurements start. The tiles were measured with the proper surface uppermost, differing from the normative method, to allow data collection by the Arm.

2.2.1 Warpage test

The tiles were identified (Fig. 4) and placed on 3 supporting studs with the warpage dial gauge at the fourth vertex to stabilize the piece, simulating the normative measurement in the data dimension. The alignment of the piece was carried out in the Faro CAM2®, a program using the plane created from the 3 points measured on the supports, the line A, and the intersection point between the A and B lines (Fig. 4). Next, the warpage was measured through the scanner, to avoid deformation by touch [14]. The same measurement procedure was performed on the inclined panel (condition 2).

thumbnail Fig. 4

Warpage measurement points.

2.2.2 Scanning

The tile was scanned using the Edge FaroArm® to evaluate the behavior of each support condition. Using the Faro CAM2® software, we extracted color maps from the point clouds. Warm colors (yellow to red) represent points above the reference plane, cool colors (light blue to dark blue) represent points below the reference plane, and green corresponds to deviations within the tolerance. The tolerance defined for the study was 0.2 mm, approximately 5% of the normative tolerance for the evaluated typologies and sizes.

2.3 Experimental design

Based on the objective of the experimental research, which is to study the elastic deformation of ceramic tiles during the performance of the dimensional test [8], the variables Typ, T, and S were selected to plan the experimental design.

Design of Experiments (DOE) is a test or a series of tests that evaluate how variable input changes influence the output variable [19]. We used a DOE − multilevel factorial with three input variables, four levels in the variable S, and two levels in the variables T and Typ. The most appropriate experimental matrix is a Multilevel Factorial Design L16 with 16 experiments, as listed in Table 1. All measurements will be conducted randomly by the same technician, at a temperature of (20 ± 2) °C and in duplicate (twice with the same tile) to avoid bias and minimize influences.

Table 1

Multilevel factorial design L16 plan and results.

3 Results and discussion

After measuring both support conditions and calculating the average deformations, the results were analyzed and summarized in Table 1. Then we performed an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to verify the influence of the input variables individually and their interactions on the variable output. The results on the influence of variables S (30, 40, 50, and 60), Typ (BIa and BIIb), and T (<7.5 mm and > 9.0 mm) on deformation are shown in the results of the standard deviations (Figs. 5 and 6), in the comparative graph (Fig. 7), results of the ANOVA analysis (Tab. 2), Tukey test (Tab. 3) and hot and cold color map (Figs. 811).

As observed in Figure 5A, the results suggest that the larger the size, the higher the standard deviation. This result shows greater instability in the measurements of larger-format tiles. In Figures 5B and 5C, typology BIIb and thin products present greater dispersion than BIa and thick products. Whit regard to format, a higher standard deviation is observed for the BIIb typology and thin products in the (60 × 60) cm size (Fig. 6).

As illustrated in Figure 7, the format samples (30 × 30) cm and the thick BIa sample (40 × 40) cm have relatively low deformations, less than 0.2 mm ≌7% of the tolerance). The other samples in the format (40 × 40) cm and the thick BIa sample (50 × 50) cm have deformations between 0.3 mm ≌ 8% of the tol.) and 0.4 mm ≌ 11% of the tolerance) of ceramic tiles when they are at the limit of the normative specification. For the other sizes, thicknesses and typologies, deformations range from 0.6 mm ≌ 17% of the tolerance) to 2.2 mm(≌ 61% of the tolerance).

These results show that increasing the format of the tile increases the deformation of the tile. In this way, typology BIa is more robust, deforming with less intensity when compared to typology BIIb. The same occurs with thicker products, which deform less than thinner products.

In addition, the results in Table 2 show that the p-value of thickness, shape, and typology are smaller than the adopted significance level (0.05), rejecting hypothesis H0 at a significance level of 5%, showing that the three variables influence the deformation. A triple interaction is observed, where the three variables interact.

Table 3 shows the outputs of the Tukey test. There is no significant interference from thickness and typology for the smallest format, corroborating with previous analysis where the size is responsible for deformations, followed by thickness and, finally, the typology.

As compared to the color maps (condition 1 versus condition 2), there is a change in the shape of the tile. The patterns are highlighted by white arrows when the deformation left the most positive point (above) or roses when there are more negative point (below). The tiles (30 × 30) cm illustrated in Figure 8 and the tiles (40 × 40) cm in thick BIa typology (Fig. 9c) do not present a perceptible change. The tiles (40 × 40) cm are illustrated in Figures 9a, 9b, and 9d, as well as the tiles (50 × 50 cm) in thick BIa typology depicted in Figure 10c. Generally, the vertices where the supports are placed (white arrows) are presented more positively, and the regions close to the center and those without support (pink arrows) are more negative.

In the other tiles (50 × 50) cm (Figs. 10a, 10b and 10d) and the (60 × 60) cm (Fig. 11), there is a significant change in the shape of the tiles due to the center of the piece and the unsupported vertex presenting results more negative in condition 1 when compared to condition 2 and the supported vertices with inverse effect, with great evidence in the piece (60 × 60) cm thin BIIb, which presents a convex format when in vertical support (condition 2) and horizontal (condition 1) presents the vertices supported almost flush with the center of the piece.

thumbnail Fig. 5

SD Charts.

thumbnail Fig. 6

SD of interactions.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Deformation of parts about shape and thickness.

Table 2

ANOVA results.

Table 3

Tukey tests.

thumbnail Fig. 8

Colors map for tiles (30 × 30) cm.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Colors map for tiles (40 × 40) cm.

thumbnail Fig. 10

Colors map for tiles (50 × 50) cm.

thumbnail Fig. 11

Colors map for tiles (60 × 60) cm.

4 Conclusion

In this study, measurements alternating the inclination of the tile were carried out to evaluate the influence of typology, thickness, and size on the elastic deformation of ceramic tiles. The tests were performed according to dimensional characteristics in [8]. The conclusions of the study were drawn as follows:

  •  The three input variables selected for the investigation process influence the elastic deformation of ceramic tiles, but at different levels.

  • The size is the variable with the most significant influence on deformation (1.42 mm in the largest size), the thickness is the second one (0.8 mm in the thin tiles), followed by the typology (0.77 mm in the BIIb).

  • The effect of the interaction on the input variables is significant, mainly in the larger sizes.

  • The tiles tested in the horizontal plane show elastic deformation at the center and unsupported vertex, with more negative results in these regions of the piece than in the supported vertices.

  • The results suggest that only tiles with sizes up to (30 × 30) cm of any thickness and typology can be measured by the data dimension without presenting variations in results due to the effect of elastic deformation.

  • For thick tiles with sizes up to (40 × 40 cm), can be measured with confidence, however a complementary study must be carried out to determine from which thickness the tiles deform with less intensity.

This article provides researchers and practitioners with an indication for the development of new methods of laboratory measurement and process control, studies on new applications and improvements in process controls considering the effect of deformation. The main limitation of this study refers to the restricted number of variables selected to verify the effect on elastic deformation of the tiles. More research is needed to investigate the influence of other variables including apparent porosity, apparent relative density and bulk density, radius of curvature and some process variables. The time required to perform one test on one tile is relatively short, taking approximately 6 days for all measurement rounds. With an increase in the number of input factors in future studies, the application of a fractional factorial design could prove beneficial. Future research ought to include more factors and variables that affect the measurement of large-format ceramic tiles.

Nomenclature

Arm: Measuring arm

BIa: The lowest porosity and density (porcelain tile)

BIIb: The second most porous and least dense

CCB: Brazil Ceramic Center

CMM: Coordinate Measuring Machines

DOE: Design of Experiments

Ed: Elastic Deformation

S: Size

MS: Measurement System

T: Thickness

Typ: Typology

References

  1. O.J.R. Baena, Baldosas cerámicas y gres porcelánico : un mundo en permanente evolución, 1. Ed. (Centro Editorial Facultad de Minas, Medellín, Colombia, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. International Organization for Standardization. ISO. Norma. ISO 13006: Ceramic tiles — Definitions, classification, characteristics and marking, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, p. 1–53 [Google Scholar]
  3. A.P. Menegazzo, Estudo da correlação entre a microestrutura e as propriedades finais de revestimentos cerâmicos do tipo grês porcelanato. Orientador: Dr. José Octavio Armani Paschoal. 2001. 291 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências na Área de Tecnologia Nuclear − Materiais) − IPEN-USP, São Paulo, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.P.N. Oliveira, D. Hotza, Tecnologia de fabricação de revestimentos cerâmicos, Editora da UFSC 2, 1–118 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Biffi, Defeitos de Fabricação de placas cerâmicas, 1. ed. (Faenza Editrice do Brasil, Rio Claro, Brasil, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. J.V. Abellán-nebot, Derivation and application of the stream of variation model to the manufacture of ceramic floor tiles, Qual. Eng. 4, 713–729 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W.E. Deming, Out of the crisis, (Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  8. International Organization for Standardization. ISO. Norma. ISO 10545 Ceramic tiles — Part 2: Determination of dimensions and surface quality. Geneva, Switzerland, 2018, p. 1–13 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Fazio et al., New instruments for determining dimensional characteristics of large size tiles (QUALICER: World Congress on Ceramic Tile Quality, Castellón − Spain, 2018), p. 1–11 [Google Scholar]
  10. Automotive In dustry Action Group (AIAG), Measurement systems analysis (MSA): reference manual, 4 ed. (AIAG, Michigan, USA, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  11. R.S. Arenhart, M. Pizzolato, Análise de Sistemas de Medição em uma Máquina de Medir por Coordenadas, Rev. FSA, Teresina, 6, 182–203 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Klaput et al., Problems of application of measurement system analysis (MSA) in metallurgical production. Metalurgija, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2016, Vol. 3, p. 535–537 [Google Scholar]
  13. R.B.D. Pereira et al., Combining Scott-Knott and GR&R methods to identify special causes of variation, Measurement, Brasil, 82, 135–144, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.H.R. Ali, J. Buajarern, New method and uncertainty estimation for plate dimensions and surface measurements, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. Taipei, 483, 1–14 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. S.M. Emam, S.A. Sayyedbarzani, Dimensional deviation measurement of ceramic tiles according to ISO 10545–2 using the machine vision, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 5, 1405–1418 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Sioma, Automated control of surface defects on ceramic tiles using 3D image analysis, Mater. Poland, 5, 1–13, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. Centro Cerâmico do Brasil − CCB, Parecer técnico. Programa Setorial da Qualidade de Placas Cerâmicas para Revestimento: Relatório Setorial n°42. Santa Gertrudes − São Paulo, 1–70 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO. Norma. ISO 10545 Ceramic tiles — Part 4: Determination of modulus of rupture and breaking strength. Geneva, Switzerland, 2019, p. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  19. D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to statistical quality control (John Wiley & Sons, United States of America, Inc, 2009), p. 6. [Google Scholar]

1

The CCB has been the technological entity of the Brazilian ceramic sector for 30 yr, developing standards and certifying (87.71 ± 0.25)% of Brazilian production [7]. CCB performs more than 30,000 tests annually, of which 3,600 are dimensional tests (ISO 10545-2), CCB is among the largest ceramic tile laboratories in the world.

Cite this article as: Fernando das Dores Silva, Ana Paula Margarido, Juliana Luiza de Souza Bonfim, Juliano Endrigo Sordan, Pedro Carlos Oprime, Proposition for analysis of elastic deformation in ceramic tiles using multilevel factorial design, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 14, 14 (2023)

All Tables

Table 1

Multilevel factorial design L16 plan and results.

Table 2

ANOVA results.

Table 3

Tukey tests.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Data dimension (Current Measurement System).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Combination of levels of the input factors.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Vertical panel.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Warpage measurement points.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

SD Charts.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

SD of interactions.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Deformation of parts about shape and thickness.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Colors map for tiles (30 × 30) cm.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Colors map for tiles (40 × 40) cm.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

Colors map for tiles (50 × 50) cm.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

Colors map for tiles (60 × 60) cm.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.