| Issue |
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 3, Number 3, 2012
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 155 - 159 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2012024 | |
| Published online | 13 May 2013 | |
Corrections and input quantities in measurement models
Torino, Italy
⋆ Correspondence: frpavese@gmail.com
Received: 15 October 2012
Accepted: 28 October 2012
The Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) requires, “that the results of a measurement have been corrected for all recognised significant systematic effects and that every effort has been made to identify such effects”, before the issue of evaluating their uncertainty is tackled. In addition, the GUM also requires that a model is used, expressing the functional dependence of the measurand on identified input quantities. The paper discusses the inter-relations between the so-defined two sets of influence quantities and proposes to unify their treatment.
Key words: GUM / correction / influence quantity / model / systematic effect
© EDP Sciences 2013
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.