EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 16 (2025) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 16 (2025) 7 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 16, 2025
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2025006
Published online 27 November 2025
  1. X. Xu, B. Ran, N. Jiang et al., A systematic review of ultrasonic techniques for defects detection in construction and building materials, Measurement. 226, 114181 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Mineo, S.G. Pierce, B. Wright et al., PAUT inspection of complex-shaped composite materials through six DOFs robotic manipulators, Compos. Insp. 57, 161–166 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. P.M. Morse, K.U. Ingard, Theoretical acoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, UK, 1968), pp. 145–178 [Google Scholar]
  4. H.T. Yan, J.W. Ma, W.N. Chen et al., Enhanced Error Compensation Method for Robotic Machining System via Two-Step Kinematic Parameters Calibration, Dalian, China, 2024, pp. 159–165 [Google Scholar]
  5. J.S. Toquica, S.T. Motta, A novel approach for robot calibration based on measurement sub-regions with comparative validation, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 131, 3995–4008 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Gill, A. Haynes, L. Justham et al., A novel robot-assisted calibration procedure for optical coordinate measuring systems, Precis. Eng. 96, 55–64 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.R. Driels, W.E. Swayze, Automated partial pose measurement system for manipulator calibration experiments, IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 10, 430–440 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  8. I.C. Ha, Kinematic parameter calibration method for industrial robot manipulator using the relative position, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 22, 1084–1090 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Ulrich, C. Steger, F. Butsch et al., Vision-guided robot calibration using photogrammetric methods, ISPRS J. Photogramm. 218, 645–662 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Selami, W. Tao, N. Lv et al., Precise robot calibration method-based 3-D positioning and posture sensor, IEEE Sens. J. 239, 7741–7749 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. H.Q. Zhuang, J.H. Yan, O. Masory, Calibration of stewart platforms and other parallel manipulators by minimizing inverse kinematic residual, J. Robot. Syst. 15, 395–405 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Wang, L. Qin, J. Liu et al., Optimization method for configuration set for field calibration of industrial robot, IEEE T. Ind. Electron. 72, 6103–6113 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Jia, H. Zeng, J. Zhang et al., Robot calibration sampling data optimization method based on improved robot observability metrics and binary simulated annealing algorithm, Sensors 24, 6171 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Bastl, N. Chakraborti, M. Valášek, Evolutionary algorithms in robot calibration, Mater. Manuf. Processes 38, 2051–2070 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Zhang, F. Peng, R. Yan, Quantification of uncertainty in robot pose errors and calibration of reliable compensation values, Robot. CIM-Int. Manuf. 89, 102765 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Ma, Y. Lu, K. Deng et al., Optimal measurement poses using LSSA for robot kinematics-flexibility calibration, IEEE Robot. Autom. Let. 9, 4974–4981 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Zheng, X. Zhao, T. Chen et al., A simultaneous ultrasound-robot calibration approach for dual-robot intervention by solving the AXP&9552;YCQ problem, IEEE T. Instrum. Meas. 73, 1–10 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Guo, C. Xu, D. Xiao et al., A tool center point calibration method of a dual-robot NDT system for semi-enclosed workpiece testing, Ind. Robot. 46, 202–210 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. H.W. Ma, X.H. Zhang, J. Wei, Research on an ultrasonic NDT system for complex surface parts, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 129, 667–670 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  20. P.I. Chatzifotis, Non-destructive testing with ultrasound in rails and ship plates, Key Eng. Mater. 605, 613–616 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. X.Y. Bai, D.X. Wang, L.Y. Zhen, Design and micromanufacturing technologies of focused piezoelectric ultrasound transducers for biomedical applications, Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 6, 2631–8644 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  22. K.J. Langenberg, R. Marklein, K. Mayer, Ultrasonic nondestructive testing of materials: theoretical foundations (CRC Press, 2012), pp. 106–135 [Google Scholar]
  23. J.M. Mccarthy, Quaternions in kinematics, Mech. Mach. Theory 209, 105949 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  24. Z.K. Zhang, H.B. Hu, P.X. Zha et al., Unified gravitational and elasto-geometrical calibration for an industrial robot using closed-form formulation, IEEE Robot. Autom. Let. 10, 7619–7626 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Liu, H. Huang, Q. Fan et al., A multi-strategy enhanced moth-flame optimization algorithm for complex inverse kinematics problems in series robots, Cluster Comput. 28, 290 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  26. M.S. Gumus, M. Kalyoncu, A novel architecture for artificial neural networks to solve the inverse kinematics problem in robotics, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 47, 469 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Karlik, S. Aydin, An improved approach to the solution of inverse kinematics problems for robot manipulators, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 13, 159–164 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Kaur, V.K. Yanumula, S. Sondhi, Trajectory planning and inverse kinematics solution of Kuka robot using COA along with pick and place application, Intel. Serv. Robot. 17, 289–302 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Mineo, S.G. Pierce, P.I. Nicholson et al., Robotic path planning for non-destructive testing − A custom MATLAB toolbox approach, Robot. Comput.-Int. Manuf. 37, 1–12 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.