EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 15 (2024) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 15 (2024) 4 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 15, 2024
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2023018
Published online 19 March 2024
  1. S. Bell, A beginner's guide to uncertainty of measurement, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Borgs, J. Chayes, B. Pittel, Phase transition and finite-size scaling for the integer partitioning problem, Random Struct. Algorithms 19, 247–288 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Brownlee, Train-test split for evaluating machine learning algorithms, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.C. Callendar, H.G. Osburn, A method for maximizing split-half reliability coefficients, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 37, 819–825 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Cho, Making reliability reliable: a systematic approach to reliability coefficients, Organ. Res. Methods 19, 651–682 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Cortina, What is coefficient alpha: an examination of theory and applications, Int. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 98–104 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Eisinga, M. Te Grotenhuis, B. Pelzer, The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown? Int. J. Public Health 58, 637–642 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. M.R. Garey, D.S. Johnson, Computers and intractability: a guide to the theory of np-completeness of mathematical sciences series (Freeman, 1979) [Google Scholar]
  9. J.M. Graham, Congeneric and (Essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability; what they are and how to use them, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 66, 930–944 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Green, R. Lissitz, S. Mulak, Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 37, 827–838 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.T. Gualtieri, L.G. Johnson, Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS vital signs, Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 21, 623–643 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Gulliksen, Theory of mental tests (Taylor & Francis Group, New York, Oxford, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Guttman, A basis for analysing test-retest reliability, Psychometrika 10, 255–282 (1945) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Hayes, The easiest hard problem, Am. Sci. 90, 113 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Karmarkar, R.M. Karp, An efficient approximation scheme for the one-dimensional bin-packing problem, 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982), Chicago, IL, USA,1982, pp. 312–320, doi: 10.1109/SFCS.1982.61 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Tavakol, Making sense of Cronbach's alpha, Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53–55 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R.A. Martin, P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsen, J. Gray, K. Weir, Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the humor styles questionnaire. J. Res. Pers. 37, 48–75 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Meadows, L. Billington, A review of the literature on marking reliability, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Mertens, The Easiest hard problem: number partitioning, in: A. Percus, G. Istrate, C. Moore (Eds.), Computational Complexity & Statistical Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006, pp. 125–139 [Google Scholar]
  20. K.R. Murphy, C.O. Davidshofer, Psychological testing: principles and applications (Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Panayides, Coefficient alpha interpret with caution, Eur. J. Psychol. 9, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Ritter, Understanding a widely misunderstood statistic: cronbach's alpha, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  23. C.P. Robert, G. Casella, Monte Carlo statistical methods (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Sajnani, V. Saini, K. Kumar, E. Gabrielova, P. Choudary, C. Lopes, Yelp Dataset Challenge http://mondego.ics.uci.edu/projects/yelp/ [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Sijtsma, On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha, Psychometrika 74, 107–120 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  26. D.L. Streiner, Starting at the beginning : an introduction to co-efficient alpha and consistency, J. Pers. Assess. 80, 99–103 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Ten Berge, G. Socan, The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality, Psychometrika 69, 613–625 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. B.L. Thompson, S.B. Green, Y. Yang, Assessment of the maximal split-half coefficient to estimate reliability, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 70, 232–251 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  29. N.M. Webb, R.J. Shavelson, E.H. Haertel, Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory, Handbook of Statistics, 2006 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.