Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 10, 2019
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2019002
Published online 26 April 2019
  1. S. Derler et al., Saf. Sci. 76 , 12 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. I.-J. Kim, H. Hsiao, P. Simeonov, Appl. Ergon. 44 , 58 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Kim, Saf. Health Work 3 , 22 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, NBR 13818 Anexo A − Determinação do Coeficiente de Atrito: Placas Cerâmicas para Revestimento − Especificações e Métodos de Ensaios, Rio de Janeiro, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  5. American National Standards Institute, A137.1: American National Standard Specifications for Ceramic Tile, Clemson, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deutsches Institut Für Normung, DIN 51130: Testing of floor coverings − Determination of the anti-slip properties, Berlin, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  7. UNE-ENV 12633:2003: Method of determination of unpolished and polished slip/skid resistance value, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Wetzel, Ph.D. thesis, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  9. G.W. Harris, S.R. Shaw, J. Occup. Accidents 9 , 287 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I.-J. Kim, Wear 360–361 , 77 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. K.E. Beschorner et al., Appl. Ergon. 38 , 773 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12. K.W. Li, W.-R. Chang, C.-C. Chang, Saf. Sci. 47 , 1434 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Liu et al., Saf. Sci. 48 , 1321 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. The measurement of the slip resistance of floor surfaces − the Tortus and the Pendulum, Constr. Build. Mater. 2 , 163 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Strandberg, Ergonomics 28 , 131 (1985) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Bowman, Proceedings of Qualicer, Espanha, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Matz, R. Gronqvist, Saf. Sci. 42 , 483 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Skiba, A. Kuschefski, N. Cziuk, Entwicklung eines normgerechten Prfifverfahrens zur Ermittlung der Gleitsicherheit von Schuhsohlen, Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt ffir Arbeitsschutz, Dortmund, Fb Nr 526 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Engels, Proceedings of Qualicer, Espanha, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Myung, J.L. Smith, T.B. Leamon, Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 11 , 313 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  21. K.W. Li et al., Saf. Sci. 42 , 547 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. K.W. Li et al., Saf. Sci. 45 , 980 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Zamora et al., Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 41 , 410 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Derler, F. Kausch, R. Huber, Saf. Sci. 43 , 751 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  25. B.S. Parra et al., Cer. Ind. 11 , 15 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  26. W.-R. Chang et al., Appl. Ergon. 41 , 27 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. W.-R. Chang, Saf. Sci. 40 , 577 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  28. M.M. Scorisa et al., Cer. Ind. 21 , 7 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.