Open Access
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 6, Number 1, 2015
Article Number 101
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 23 February 2015
  1. D.J. Whitehouse, The parameter rash – is there a cure? Wear 83, 75–78 (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.J. Whitehouse, Handbook of surface and nanometrology (CRC Press, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. R.K. Leach, Fundamental principles of engineering nanometrology, 2nd edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. A.A.G. Bruzzone, H.L. Costa, P.M. Lonardo, D.A. Lucca, Advances in engineering surfaces for functional performance, Ann. CIRP 57, 750–769 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.P. Malse, K. Rajurkar, A. Samant, H.N. Hansen, S. Bapat, W. Jiang, Bio-inspired functional surfaces for advanced applications, Ann. CIRP, 62, 607–628 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Jiang, P.J. Scott, D.J. Whitehouse, L.A. Blunt, Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 463, 2071–2099 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  7. R.K. Leach, Characterisation of areal surface texture (Springer, Berlin, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. T.R. Thomas, Roughness and function. Surf. Topog.: Met. Prop. 2, 014001 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. R.K. Leach, A. Weckenmann, J.M. Coupland, W. Hartmann, Interpreting the probe-surface interaction of surface measuring instruments, or what is a surface? Surf. Topog.: Met. Prop. 2, 035001 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. ISO/R 468, Surface roughness – Parameters, their values and general rules for specifying surfaces (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1966) [Google Scholar]
  11. ISO, How to write standards (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. BSI 0, A Standard for Standards – Principles of Standardization (British Standards Institute, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.L. Giusca, R.K. Leach, F. Helary, T. Gutauskas, L. Nimishakavi, Calibration of the scales of areal surface topography-measuring instruments: part 1. Measurement noise and residual flatness, Meas. Sci. Technol. 23, 035008 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C.L. Giusca, R.K. Leach, F. Helary, Calibration of the scales of areal surface topography-measuring instruments: part 2. Amplification, linearity and squareness, Meas. Sci. Technol. 23, 065005 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C.L. Giusca, R.K. Leach, Calibration of the scales of areal surface topography-measuring instruments: part 3. Resolution, Meas. Sci. Technol. 24, 105010 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Seewig, M. Eifler, G. Wiora, Unambiguous evaluation of a chirp measurement standard, Surf. Topog.: Met. Prop. 2, 045003 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms, JCGM 200 (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  18. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, JCGM 100 (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. P.J. de Groot, Progress in the specification of optical instruments for the measurement of surface form and texture, Proc. SPIE, 91100M (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. T.J. Quinn, Practical realization of the definition of the metre, including recommended radiations of other optical frequency standards (2001), Metrologia 40, 103–133 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C.J. Evans, A.D. Davies, Certification, self-calibration and uncertainty in optical surface testing, Int. J. Precision Technol. 3, 388–402 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Haitjema, G. Kotte, Dynamic probe calibration up to 10 kHz, Measurement 21, 107–112 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P.J. de Groot, X. Colonna de Lega, D.A. Grigg, Step height measurements using a combination of a laser displacement gage and a broadband interferometric surface profiler, Proc. SPIE 4778, 127–130 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Olszak, J. Schmit, High-stability white-light interferometry with reference signal for real-time correction of scanning errors, Opt. Eng. 42, 54–59 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C.J. Evans, R.J. Hocken, W.T. Estler, Self-calibration: reversal, redundancy, error separation, and ‘absolute testing, Ann. CIRP 45, 617–634 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.