EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 5 / No 2 (2014) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 5 2 (2014) 203 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 5, Number 2, 2014
Article Number 203
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2014006
Published online 09 October 2014
  1. J. Swart, That’s why it matters: How knowing creates value, Management Learning 42, 319–332 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.H. Powell, J. Swart, This is what the fuss is about: a systemic modelling for organisational knowing, J. Knowl. Manag. 9, 45–58 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. V. Hubka, Design for Quality and Design Methodology, J. Eng. Design 3, 5–15 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Mørup, A New Design for Quality Paradigm, J. Eng. Design 3, 63–80 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.S. Phadke, Quality Engineering using Robust Design (Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Deshpande, The use of geometric uncertainty data in aero engine structural analysis and design, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 2013, pp. 111–138 [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Cristofolini, S. Filippi, C. Bandera, The role of product feature relations in a knowledge based methodology to manage design modifications for product measurability, Int. J. Prod. Res. 47, 2373–2389 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. National Measurement Office, Rolls-Royce Industrial Case Study: 2010, http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/nmo/docs/nms/economic-reviews-august-2010-updates/rrcasestudy-july-2010.pdf [Accessed 13 April 2014] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. McMahon, A. Lowe, S. Culley, Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification, J. Eng. Design 15, 307–325 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Wynn, J. Clarkson, Models of designing, in Design process improvement: a review of current practice, edited by J. Clarkson, C. Eckert (Springer-Verlag, London, 2004), pp. 34–59 [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Ray, S. Clegg, Tacit Knowing, Communication and Power: Lessons from Japan? in Managing Knowledge, edited by S. Little, T. Ray, 2nd edn. (Sage, London, 2005), pp. 319–347 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1966) [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Nonaka, A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organiz. Sci. 5, 14–37 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Wilson, The nonsense of “knowledge management”, Inform. Res. 8, 1–33 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, N. Konno, SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation, Long Range Planning 33, 5–34 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Tsoukas, Do we really understand tacit knowledge? in: M. Easterby-Smith, in Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, edited by M. Lyles (Blackwell, Oxford, 2003), pp. 410–427 [Google Scholar]
  18. S.D.N. Cook, J.S. Brown, Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing, Organiz. Sci. 10, 381–400 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Sydenham, Relationship between measurement, knowledge and advancement, Measurement 34, 3–16 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Kunzmann, T. Pfeifer, R. Schmitt, H. Schwenke, A. Weckenmann, Productive Metrology – Adding Value to Manufacture, CIRP Annal. Manufact. Technol. 54, 155–168 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Koestler, The Ghost in the Machine (Hutchinson & Co, London, 1967) [Google Scholar]
  22. NIST, Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 1993) [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Giaglis, A taxonomy of business process modeling and information systems modeling techniques, Int. J. Flexible Manufact. Syst. 13, 209–228 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P.M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, 2nd edn. (Random House, London, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. F. Demoly, X. Yan, B. Eynard, Integrated product relationships management: a model to enable concurrent product design and assembly sequence planning, J. Eng. Design 23, 544–561 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Maropoulos, D. Ceglarek, Design verification and validation in product lifecycle, CIRP Annal. Manufact. Technol. 59, 740–759 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ventana Systems, Vensim, http://vensim.com [Accessed 13 April 2014] [Google Scholar]
  28. N. van Gestel, Determining measurement uncertainties of feature measurements on CMMs, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leuven, 2011, pp. 37–38 [Google Scholar]
  29. R.G. Wilhelm, R. Hocken, H. Schwenke, Task specific uncertainty in coordinate measurement, CIRP Annal. Manufact. 50, 553–563 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Krogstie, P. Andersson, A Case Study on Reuse of Manufacturing Knowledge – Comparing Defense Practices with Automotive & Aerospace Practices, Proc. CIRP 3, 430–435 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. H.S. Nielsen, Recent developments in International Organization for Standardization geometrical product specification standards and strategic plans for future work, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, J. Eng. Manufact. 227, 643–649 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  32. ISO 17450-2, Geometric product specifications (GPS) – General concepts – Part 2: Basic tenets, specifications, operators, uncertainties and ambiguities (ISO, Geneva, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Yearworth, Inductive Modelling of an Entrepreneurial System, 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, 25-29 July 2010, Seoul, Korea [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.