Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 2, Number 2, 2011
Page(s) 101 - 119
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2011105
Published online 10 January 2012
  1. C.M. Sutton, M.P. Fitzgerald, W. Giardini, A Method of analysis for cross-floats between pressure balances, Metrologia 42, S212–S215 (2005) [CrossRef]
  2. B. Blagojevic, I. Bajsic, Determination of the Effective Area of a Gas-Pressure Balance for Low Pressures, in XVII IMEKO World Congress, edited by K. Havrilla (2003)
  3. R.S. Dadson, S.L. Lewis, G.N. Peggs, The Pressure Balance: Theory and Practice (HMSO, London, 1982)
  4. A.B. Forbes, P.M. Harris, Estimation algorithms in the calculation of effective area of pressure balances, Metrologia 36, 689–692 (1999) [CrossRef]
  5. J.W. Wilkinson, Exact Expressions for the Covariances Between Products of Randoms Variables, Technical report ORNL-TM-1977, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Atomic Energy Commission, USA, 1967
  6. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 2nd edn., BIPM (1995), ISBN 92-67-10188-9
  7. B. Efron, G. Gong, A Leisurely look at the bootstrap, the Jackknife, and cross-validation, Am. Stat. 37, 36–48 (1983) [CrossRef]
  8. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)
  9. M.G. Cox, B.R.L. Siebert, The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty, Metrologia 43, S178–S188 (2006) [CrossRef]
  10. V. Ramnath, Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo measurement uncertainty techniques with application to effective area determination in pressure standards, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 1, 51–57 (2010) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  11. D. Zvizdic, L.G. Bermanec, G. Bonnier, E. Renaot, Uncertainty Budget of Pressure Balance Effective Area Determined by Comparison Method, in XVII IMEKO World Congress (2003)
  12. A. Picard, R.S. Davis, M. Glaser, K. Fujii, Revised formula for the density of moist air (CIPM-2007), Metrologia 45, 149–155 (2007) [CrossRef]
  13. E.C. Morris, K.M.K. Fen, The Calibration of Weights and Balances, Monograph 4: NML Technology Transfer Series, 3rd edn. (CSIRO National Measurement Laboratory, 2003)
  14. D. Tabor, Gases, Liquids and Solids, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1985)
  15. P.J. Mohr, B.N. Taylor, D.B. Newell, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008)
  16. I. Kocas, Technical Protocol of EURAMET.M.P-K13 (500 MPa), Technical report, TUBITAK UME, 2009
  17. M.G. Cox, P.M. Harris, Software Support for Metrology Best Practice Guide No. 6 – Uncertainty Evaluation, Technical report, NPL, UK, 2004
  18. B.R.L. Siebert, P. Ciarlini, D. Sibold, Monte Carlo Study on Logical and Statistical Correlation, in VII IMEKO World Congress, edited by P. Ciarlini, E. Filipe, A.B. Forbes, F. Pavese, C. Perruchet, B.R.L. Siebert (2005)
  19. M. Krystek, M. Anton, A least-squares algorithm for fitting data points with mutually correlated coordinates to a straight line, Meas. Sci. Technol. 22, 1–9 (2011) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  20. P. Penfield, Principle of Maximum Entropy, in Information, Entropy and Computation (2010), www.mit.edu, http://www.mtl.mit.edu/Courses/6.050/2010/notes/chapter9.pdf
  21. S. Lewis, G. Peggs, The Pressure Balance: A Practical Guide to its Use, 2nd edn. (HMSO, London, 1992), ISBN 0114800618
  22. W. Schelter, Maxima – A Computer Algebra System (Version 5.23.2) (Free Software Foundation, 2011), http://maxima.sourceforge.net/
  23. J.W. Eaton, GNU Octave Manual, Network Theory Limited (2002), ISBN 0-9541617-2-6, www.gnu.org/software/octave
  24. J.E. Shigley, C.R. Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design, 6th edn. (Metric Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2003)
  25. S. Dogra, S. Yadav, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, Computer simulation of a 1.0 GPa piston-cylinder assembly using finite element analysis (FEA), Measurement 43, 1345–1354 (2010) [CrossRef]
  26. A.K. Bandyopadhyay, D.A. Olson, Characterization of a compact 200 MPa controlled clearance piston gauge as a primary pressure standard using the heydemann and welch method, Metrologia 43, 573–582 (2006) [CrossRef]
  27. P.L.M. Heydemann, B.E. Welch, Piston Gauges, in Experimental Thermodynamics, Experimental Thermodynamics of Non-Reacting Fluids, edited by B. Le Neindre, B. Vodar (Butterworth and Co., 1975), Chap. 4, pp. 147–202
  28. F.M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 2nd edn. (McGraw-Hill, 1991)
  29. JCGM/WG1, Evaluation of Measurement Data – Supplement 1 to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement – Propagation of Distributions using a Monte Carlo Method, 1st edn., Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2007)
  30. C. Elster, B. Toman, Bayesian uncertainty analysis for a regression model versus application of GUM supplement 1 to the least-squares estimate, Metrologia 48, 233–240 (2011) [CrossRef]
  31. A.B. Forbes, Nonlinear Least Squares and Baysesian Inference, in Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology and Testing, edited by F. Pavese, M. Bar, A.B. Forbes, J.M. Linares, C. Perruchet, N.F. Zhang (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2009), pp. 104–112
  32. M.G. Cox, P.M. Harris, Software Specifications for Uncertainty Evaluation, Technical report, NPL, UK, 2006
  33. W. Bich, Uncertainty Evaluation by Means of a Monte Carlo Approach, in BIPM Workshop 2 on CCRI (II) Activity Uncertainties and Comparisons (2008), www.bipm.org, http://www.bipm.org/wg/CCRI–%"28II–%"29/WORKSHOP–%"28II–%"29/Allowed/2/Bich.pdf
  34. R.L. Burden, J.D. Faires, Numerical Analysis (Brooks/Cole, 2001), ISBN 0-534-38216-9
  35. M. Krystek, M. Anton, A weighted total least-squares algorithm for fitting a straight line, Meas. Sci. Technol. 18, 3438–3442 (2007) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  36. M. Krystek, M. Anton, Weighted total least squares for mutually correlated coordinates (2011), www.mathworks.com

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.