Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 2, Number 1, 2011
Page(s) 61 - 73
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2011010
Published online 29 June 2011
  1. S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson, Process capability indices (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993)
  2. D.R. Bothe, Measuring process capability (MC Graw Hill, New York, 1997)
  3. S. Kotz, C.R. Lovelace, Process capability indices in theory and practice (Arnold, London, 1998)
  4. W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz, Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2006), Vol. 12
  5. V.E. Kane, Process capability indices, J. Qual. Tech. 18, 41–52 (1986)
  6. L.K. Chan, S.W. Cheng, F.A. Spiring, A new measure of process capability: Cpm, J. Qual. Tech. 20, 162–175 (1988)
  7. W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson, Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices, J. Qual. Tech. 24, 216–231 (1992)
  8. K. Vännman, A unified approach to capability indices, Stat. Sinica 5, 805–820 (1995)
  9. R.A. Boyles, Process capability with asymmetric tolerances, Comm. Stat. Sim. Comp. 23, 615–643 (1994) [CrossRef]
  10. K.S. Chen, W.L. Pearn, Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances, J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 24, 559–568 (2001) [CrossRef]
  11. D. Grau, Process yield and capability indices, Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods 40, 2751–2771 (2011) [CrossRef]
  12. D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: basic methods, Qual. Eng. 6, 115–135 (1993) [CrossRef]
  13. D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part II: experimental design models and variance component estimation, Qual. Eng. 6, 289–305 (1993) [CrossRef]
  14. W.A. Levinson, How good is gauge? Semicond. Int. 165–168 (1995)
  15. H.J. Mittag, Measurement error effects on the performance of process capability indices, Front. Stat. Qual. Control 5, 195–206 (1997)
  16. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Statistical analysis of process capability indices with measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 18, 321–332 (2002) [CrossRef]
  17. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Statistical analysis of process capability indices with measurement errors: the case of Cp, Stat. Meth. Appl. 10, 273–285 (2001) [CrossRef]
  18. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Estimation of Cpm when measurement errors is present, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 22, 787–801 (2006) [CrossRef]
  19. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, Measuring process capability based on Cpk with gauge measurement errors, Microelec. Rel. 45, 739–751 (2005) [CrossRef]
  20. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, One-sided process capability assessment in the presence of measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 22, 771–785 (2006) [CrossRef]
  21. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, Estimating and testing process precision with presence of gauge measurement errors, Qual. Quant. 41, 757–777 (2007) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  22. W.L. Pearn, M.H. Shu, B.M. Hsu, Testing process capability based on Cpm in the presence of random measurement errors, J. Appl. Stat. 32, 1003–1024 (2005) [CrossRef]
  23. B.M. Hsu, M.H. Shu, W.L. Pearn, Measuring process capability based on Cpmk with gauge measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 23, 597–614 (2007) [CrossRef]
  24. D. Grau, Moments of the unbalanced non-central chi-square distribution, Stat. Prob. Lett. 79, 361–367 (2009) [CrossRef]
  25. W.L. Pearn, P.C. Lin, K.S. Chen, Estimating process capability index Cpmk'' for asymmetric tolerances: Distributional properties, Metrika 54, 261–279 (2001) [CrossRef]
  26. W.L. Pearn, P.C. Lin, Testing process performance based on capability index Cpk with critical values, Comp. Ind. Eng. 47, 351–369 (2004) [CrossRef]
  27. P.C. Lin, W.L. Pearn, Testing process performance based on the capability index Cpm, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 27, 351–358 (2005) [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.