EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 2 / No 1 (2011) Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 2 1 (2011) 61-73 References
Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 2, Number 1, 2011
Page(s) 61 - 73
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2011010
Published online 29 June 2011
  1. S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson, Process capability indices (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993) [Google Scholar]
  2. D.R. Bothe, Measuring process capability (MC Graw Hill, New York, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Kotz, C.R. Lovelace, Process capability indices in theory and practice (Arnold, London, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  4. W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz, Encyclopedia and handbook of process capability indices (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2006), Vol. 12 [Google Scholar]
  5. V.E. Kane, Process capability indices, J. Qual. Tech. 18, 41–52 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  6. L.K. Chan, S.W. Cheng, F.A. Spiring, A new measure of process capability: Cpm, J. Qual. Tech. 20, 162–175 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  7. W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson, Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices, J. Qual. Tech. 24, 216–231 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Vännman, A unified approach to capability indices, Stat. Sinica 5, 805–820 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  9. R.A. Boyles, Process capability with asymmetric tolerances, Comm. Stat. Sim. Comp. 23, 615–643 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K.S. Chen, W.L. Pearn, Capability indices for processes with asymmetric tolerances, J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 24, 559–568 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Grau, Process yield and capability indices, Commun. Stat. Theory. Methods 40, 2751–2771 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part I: basic methods, Qual. Eng. 6, 115–135 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.C. Montgomery, G.C. Runger, Gauge capability and designed experiments. Part II: experimental design models and variance component estimation, Qual. Eng. 6, 289–305 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W.A. Levinson, How good is gauge? Semicond. Int. 165–168 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  15. H.J. Mittag, Measurement error effects on the performance of process capability indices, Front. Stat. Qual. Control 5, 195–206 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Statistical analysis of process capability indices with measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 18, 321–332 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Statistical analysis of process capability indices with measurement errors: the case of Cp, Stat. Meth. Appl. 10, 273–285 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Bordignon, M. Scagliarini, Estimation of Cpm when measurement errors is present, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 22, 787–801 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, Measuring process capability based on Cpk with gauge measurement errors, Microelec. Rel. 45, 739–751 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  20. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, One-sided process capability assessment in the presence of measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 22, 771–785 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. W.L. Pearn, M.Y. Liao, Estimating and testing process precision with presence of gauge measurement errors, Qual. Quant. 41, 757–777 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W.L. Pearn, M.H. Shu, B.M. Hsu, Testing process capability based on Cpm in the presence of random measurement errors, J. Appl. Stat. 32, 1003–1024 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. B.M. Hsu, M.H. Shu, W.L. Pearn, Measuring process capability based on Cpmk with gauge measurement errors, Qual. Rel. Eng. Int. 23, 597–614 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Grau, Moments of the unbalanced non-central chi-square distribution, Stat. Prob. Lett. 79, 361–367 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. W.L. Pearn, P.C. Lin, K.S. Chen, Estimating process capability index Cpmk'' for asymmetric tolerances: Distributional properties, Metrika 54, 261–279 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. W.L. Pearn, P.C. Lin, Testing process performance based on capability index Cpk with critical values, Comp. Ind. Eng. 47, 351–369 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P.C. Lin, W.L. Pearn, Testing process performance based on the capability index Cpm, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 27, 351–358 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.