Approaches to evaluating measurement uncertainty
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., 3 2 (2012) 71-77
Published online: 2012-11-14
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Beyond the First Generation of Wind Modeling for Resource Assessment and Siting: From Meteorology to Uncertainty Quantification
Mark KellyEnergies 18 (7) 1589 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18071589
Comparison of uncertainty evaluation methods for virtual experiments with an application to a virtual CMM
Marcel van Dijk and Gertjan KokMeasurement: Sensors 101785 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2024.101785
Bibliometric review of measurement uncertainty: Research classification and future tendencies
Nanang Kusnandar, Himma Firdaus, Ihsan Supono, Bayu Utomo, Iput Kasiyanto and Qudsiyyatul LailiyahMeasurement 232 114636 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114636
Application of maximum statistical entropy in formulating a non-gaussian probability density function in flow uncertainty analysis with prior measurement knowledge
Vishal RamnathInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 15 6 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2024003
Uncertainties of Surface Roughness and Tool Wear in Machining of AISI 4140 Alloy Steel
Shuvajit Ghosh and Nirmal Kumar MandalJournal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 23 (03) 509 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686724500215
Handbook of Metrology and Applications
H. Gupta, Shanay Rab and N. GargHandbook of Metrology and Applications 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1550-5_128-1
2441 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2074-7_128
A probabilistic framework for product health monitoring in multistage manufacturing using Unsupervised Artificial Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes
Moschos Papananias, Thomas E McLeay, Mahdi Mahfouf and Visakan KadirkamanathanProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 237 (9) 1295 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054221136510
Uncertainty Estimation for the Liquid Hydrocarbons Measurement in Static and Dynamic Measurement Systems: A Colombian Case Study
F. Cala, E. Nuñez, N. Bahamón and J. A. FuentesSPE Journal 26 (04) 1652 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.2118/205025-PA
Data comparisons and uncertainty: a roadmap for gaining in competence and improving the reliability of results
Abdérafi Charki and Franco PaveseInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 10 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2018016
A Bayesian framework to estimate part quality and associated uncertainties in multistage manufacturing
Moschos Papananias, Thomas E. McLeay, Mahdi Mahfouf and Visakan KadirkamanathanComputers in Industry 105 35 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.10.008
Monte Carlo Simulation in Uncertainty Evaluation: Strategy, Implications and Future Prospects
N. Garg, S. Yadav and D. K. AswalMAPAN 34 (3) 299 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-019-00345-5
A generalized approach to determine the optimal manufacturing target for arbitrary loss functions and process models
Alexander Schöch, Carlo Bach, Carsten Ziolek and Enrico SavioThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 97 (9-12) 3557 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2223-3
Traceability validation of a high speed short-pulse testing method used in LED production
Elena Revtova, Edgar Moreno Vuelban, Dongsheng Zhao, Jacques Brenkman and Henk UldenInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 8 30 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017024
Application of quantile functions for the analysis and comparison of gas pressure balance uncertainties
Vishal RamnathInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 8 4 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2016020
Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in hardness measurements
Gouda M. Mahmoud and Riham S. HegazyInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 8 14 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017014
Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo methods on the flatness uncertainty estimation in coordinate measuring machine
Abdelilah Jalid, Said Hariri, Abdellah El Gharad and Jean Paul SenelaerInternational Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering 7 (3) 302 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2016013
Uncertainty modelling of real-time observation of a moving object: photogrammetric measurements
Thomas UlrichMetrologia 52 (2) 201 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/2/201
68 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275469
The evaluation of uncertainty in mass calibration: possible approaches in a comparison study
J A Sousa, A B Forbes, A S Ribeiro, et al.Journal of Physics: Conference Series 459 012033 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012033