Open Access
| Issue |
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 17, 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 8 | |
| Number of page(s) | 12 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2026001 | |
| Published online | 06 May 2026 | |
- Greenhouse Gas Protocol, https://ghgprotocol.org [Google Scholar]
- Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener, 2021, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy [Google Scholar]
- International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions in 2023, https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2023 [Google Scholar]
- A. Connor, J. Shaw, A framework for classifying methane monitoring requirements, emission sources and monitoring methods, NPL Report ENV 52, (2024), https://doi.org/10.47120/npl.ENV52 [Google Scholar]
- Climate Change, The physical science basis, in: T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, P.M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013, 1535 pp. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5\_all\_final.pdf [Google Scholar]
- N. Howes, F. Innocenti, A. Finlayson, C. Dimopoulos, R. Robinson, T. Gardiner, Remote measurements of industrial CO2 emissions using ground-based differential absorption lidar in the wavelength region, Remote Sensing, 15, 1–21 (2023) [Google Scholar]
- N. Howes, F. Innocenti, A. Finlayson, J. Shaw, J. Connolly, L. Nguyen, Methane from Anaerobic Digestion (MEAD) Study, NPL Report, 2023 [Google Scholar]
- F. Innocenti, R. Robinson, T. Gardiner, N. Howes, N. Yarrow, Comparative assessment of methane emissions from onshore LNG facilities measured using differential absorption lidar, Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 3301–3310 (2023) [Google Scholar]
- DIAL for Remote Emissions Measurement, NPL 2018, https://www.npl.co.uk/getattachment/products-services/Environmental/Absorption-Lidar-DIAL/instruments-dial-flyer.pdf?lang=en-GB [Google Scholar]
- CEN DTR 18145 Environmentally Sustainable AI, March 2025 [Google Scholar]
- S. Farjana, Introduction to life cycle assessment, Chapter 1. Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Mining, 1–13 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- I. Muralikrishna et al, Chapter five - life cycle assessment, Environ. Manag. 57–75 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- A. Temporelli, M. Carvalho, P. Girardi, Life cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries: an overview of recent literature, MDPI: Energies, 13, (2020) [Google Scholar]
- X. Lai et al., Critical review of life cycle assessment of Lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: a lifespan perspective, eTransportation, 12, 100169 (2022) [Google Scholar]
- World Resources Institute, A corporate accounting and reporting standard (The Green House Gas Protocol, 2015), https://ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools, https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/Global-Warming-Potential-Values, https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/ghg-uncertainty.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Climate Change Act, Climate Change Act, 2008. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents [Google Scholar]
- European Commission, European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/lca.htm [Google Scholar]
- J. Porzio et al., Life-cycle assessment considerations for batteries and battery materials, Adv. Energy Mater. (2021) [Google Scholar]
- Global battery alliance, Greenhouse gas rulebook (GBA, 2022) [Google Scholar]
- F. Arshad, Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries: a critical review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 180, 106164 (2022) [Google Scholar]
- R. Tolomeo, G. De Feo, R. Adami, L. Sesti Osso, Application of life cycle assessment to lithium ion batteries in the automotive sector. MDPI: Sustainability, 12, (2020) [Google Scholar]
- A. Nordelof, S. Poulikidou, M. Chordia, F. Bitencourt de Oliveira, J. Tivander, R. Arvidsson, Methodological approaches to end-of-life modelling in life cycle assessments of lithium-ion batteries, MDPI Batteries, 5, (2019) [Google Scholar]
- M. Huijbregts et al., ReCiPe 2016. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, (2016) [Google Scholar]
- L. Zeng, S. Liu, E. Kozan, P. Corry, M. Masoud, A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of mine supply chain management, Resour. Policy 74, 102274 (2021) [Google Scholar]
- Cornish Lithium (https://cornishlithium.com/projects/), Sustainability Report https://cdn.sanity.io/files/rui0grfj/production/89dfad955515ebbdd452d47f2276daae1559430d.pdf [Google Scholar]
- A. Der Kiureghian, Measures of structural safety under imperfect states of knowledge, J. Struct. Eng. 115, (1988), UC Berkley. [Google Scholar]
- JCGM 100:2008 Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 2008, https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM100-2008E.pdf [Google Scholar]
- A.L.C. Merlo, D.S. Mendonca, J. Santos et al., Blockchain for the carbon market: a literature review, Discov. Environ. 3, 68 (2025) [Google Scholar]
- EIP-AGRI Focus Group: Innovative Short Food Supply Chain Management, 2015, https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/default/files/eip-agri_fg_innovative_food_supply_chain_management_final_report_2015_en.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Insights Real-Time Information Service (IRIS), https://bmrs.elexon.co.uk/iris [Google Scholar]
- D. Finegan, M. Scheel, J. Robinson, B. Tjaden, I. Hunt, T. Mason, J. Millichamp, M. Michiel, G. Offer, G. Hinds, D. Brett, P. Shearing, In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway, Nat. Commun. 6, 6924 (2015) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.