Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 16, 2025
Article Number 9
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2025009
Published online 10 December 2025
  1. P.H. Kuo, M.J. Syu, S.Y. Yin, H.H. Liu, C.Y. Zeng, W.C. Lin, Intelligent optimization algorithms for control error compensation and task scheduling for a robotic arm, Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 8, 334–356 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Zhao, M. Zhang, H. Wu, S. Jing, T. Zhou, M. Todoh, A comprehensive sensorimotor control model emulating neural activities for planar human arm reaching movements, Appl. Intell.: Int. J. Artifi. Intell. Neural Netw. Compl. Probl. −Solv. Technol. 54, 2508–2527 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Zhao, Y. Sun, H_∞ control of switched Lurie systems with dwell time, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I. J. Syst. Control Eng. 238, 1112–1122 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Yuan, L. Guo, X. Zhang, X. Lai, W. Lu, Novel active disturbance rejection‐based sliding‐mode control for permanent magnet linear synchronous motor drives, IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 19, 119–129 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. M.S. Ben, M. Belkhiri, A. Belkhiri et al., Active disturbance rejection control of flexible industrial manipulator: A MIMO benchmark problem, Eur. J. Control, 77, 1–10 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Nuo, I. Sarras, H. Yin, B. Jayawardhana, Consensus of Euler-Lagrange agents with internal model disturbance rejection and interconnection delays, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 69, 4066–4071 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Flores-Padilla, C. Treesatayapun, Adaptive controller based on the affine equivalent model with disturbance rejection for discrete-time switched systems, Int. J. Syst. Sci.: Theory Practice Math. Modell. Simul. Optimiz. Control Relation Biol. Econ. Indust. Transport. Syst. 54, 3059–3070 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Xie, L. Li, X. Song, W. Xue, K. Song, Parameter self‐learning feedforward compensation‐based active disturbance rejection for path‐following control of self‐driving forklift trucks, Asian J. Control 25, 4435–4451 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Yao, W. Yi, M. Haifeng, L. Xichang, Compensation control of hydraulic manipulator under pressure shock disturbance, Nonlinear Dyn. 11, 11153–11169 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Luo, G. He, N. Hou, Reflux power optimization of a dual-active hybrid full-bridge converter based on active disturbance rejection control, Energies 17, 4299–4300 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Jing, J. Wang, J. Gao, Y. Chen, Y. Cao, Y. Cao, Self-tuning adaptive active disturbance rejection pitch control of a manta-ray-like underwater glider, Ocean Eng. 254, 1–111364.11 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wellendorf, P. Tichelmann, J. Uhl, Performance analysis of a dynamic test bench based on a linear direct drive, Arch. Adv. Eng. Sci. 1, 55–62 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Cheng, L. Songxiao, Z. Zhuo, Industrial robot arm dynamic modeling simulation and variable-gain iterative learning control strategy design, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 38, 3729–3739 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Choi, S.J. Yoon, Y.L. Park, Linear electrostatic actuators with Moire-effect optical proprioceptive sensing and electroadhesive braking, Int. J. Robot. Res. 43, 646–664 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Armstrong-Hough, P. Lin, S. Venkatesh, M. Ghous, C.L. Hough, S.H. Cook, Ethnic disparities in deep sedation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the united states: secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial, Annals Am. Thoracic Soc. 21, 620–626 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  16. M.S. Ryan, Does the use of antimicrobials in different periodontal treatment strategies result in better treatment outcomes? − A radiographic analysis, Evid. −Based Dent. 25, 31–32 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Ito, Y. Ishii, S. Kurumaya, K. Kagaya, T. Nakamura, A design method for instantaneous force generation based on a mantis shrimp with exoskeleton spring, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.: Joint Publ. IEEE Indust. Electron. Soc. ASME Dyn. Syst. Control Division 29, 960–971 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Geng, Y. Zheng, Y. Li, Z. Li, Early radiographic and clinical outcomes of robotic‐arm‐assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, Orthopaedic Surgery 16, 2732–2740 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Sun, X. Dai, Q. Yin, L. Ju, X. Tang, M. Li, Design and control of ultrasound image-guided prostatic brachytherapy robot, Recent Patents Mech. Eng. 17, 116–122 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  20. T.H. Nguyen, D.T. Nguyen, V.H. Tran, T.T. Mac, A study on rocker arm defect inspection based on vision system, Int. J. Modern Phys. B. Condens. Matter Phys. Stat. Phys. Appl. Phys. 38, 1–2440024.12 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Hye, L. Jewoo, C. Kyu-jin, Arm back support suit (Abs-Suit) for parcel delivery with a passive load redistribution mechanism, IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 9, 1238–1245 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Cartier, G. Rao, E. Viehweger, L. Vigouroux, Evolution of muscle coordination and mechanical output throughout four weeks of arm cranking submaximal training, J. Neurophysiol. 129, 541–551 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  23. S.Y. Yang, K.Y. Kim, J.U. Ko, S.W. Seo, S.T. Hwang, J.H. Park, H.S. Jung, Y.J. Gong, J.W. Suk, H. Rodrigue, H.P. Moon, J.C. Koo, J.D. Nam, H.R. Choi, Design and control of lightweight bionic arm driven by soft twisted and coiled artificial muscles, Soft Robot. 10, 17–29 (2023) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.