Open Access
Issue
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 11, 2020
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2019018
Published online 29 January 2020
  1. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, OIML, Tech. Rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM (2008). Revised 1st edition – https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ [Google Scholar]
  2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, OIML, Tech. Rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM Supplement 1 (2008). 1st edition – https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ [Google Scholar]
  3. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAP, OIML, Tech. Rep., JCGM/WG1 GUM Supplement 2 (2011). 1st edition – https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/ [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Bich, M.G. Cox, C. Michotte, Metrologia 53 (5), S149–S159 (2016) DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/53/5/S149 [Google Scholar]
  5. P.H. Harris, C.E. Matthews, M.G. Cox, Metrologia 51 (3), 243–252 (2014) DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/243 [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Ramnath, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8 (4), 1–18 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2016020 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Possolo, Metrologia 47 (3), 262–271 (2010) DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/3/017 [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Ramnath, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8 (29), 1–29 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2017018 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Nagler, C. Czado, J. Multivar. Anal. 151, 69–89 (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Segers, M. Sibuya, H. Tsukahara, J. Multivar, Anal. 155, 35–51 (2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jmva.2016.11.010 [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Acar, M. Rais-Rohani, C.D. Eamon, Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 4 (2/3), 166–187 (2010) DOI: 10.1504/IJRS.2010.032444 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Rahman, H. Xu, Prob. Eng. Mech. 19 (4), 393–408 (2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.04.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G.L. Bretthorst, AIP Conf. Proc. 1553 (3), 3–15 (2013) DOI: 10.1063/1.4819977 [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Armstrong, G.J. Sutton, D.B. Hibbert, Metrologia 56 (1), 015019 (15pp) DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/aaf7d1 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Rosenblatt, Ann. Math. Stat. 23 (3), 470–472 (1952) DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177729394 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Lebrun, A. Dutfoy, Prob. Eng. Mech. 24 (4), 577–584 (2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.04.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.J. van Albada, P.A. Robinson, J. Neurosci. Methods 161 (2), 205–11 (2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. K.H. Chang, Reliability analysis, in e-Design Computer-Aided Engineering Design, edited by K.H. Chang (Academic Press, 2015), chap. 10, pp. 523–595 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mathworks, Tech. Rep., Mathworks (2019), https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/prob.normaldistribution.icdf.html [Google Scholar]
  20. J.W. Eaton, Tech. Rep., Sourceforge (2019), https://octave.sourceforge.io/nan/function/norminv.html [Google Scholar]
  21. T.E. Oliphant, Tech. Rep., SciPy.org (2019), https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/index.html [Google Scholar]
  22. D.W. Scott, S.R. Sain, in Handbook of statistics - Data mining and data visualization, edited by C.R. Rao, E.J. Wegman, J.L. Solka (Elsevier, Oxford, 2005), Chap. 9, pp. 229–261 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Willink, Metrologia 46 (3), 154–166 (2009) DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/3/002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Z.A. Karian, E.J. Dudewicz, P. Mcdonald, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 25 (3), 611–642 (1996) DOI: 10.1080/03610919608813333 [Google Scholar]
  25. C.G. Corlu, M. Meterelliyoz, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 45 (7), 2276–96 (2015) DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2014.901355 [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Wang, Tech. Rep., CRAN (2019), https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gb/index.html [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Nagler, C. Schellhase, C. Czado, Depend. Models 5 (1), 99–120 (2017) DOI: 10.1515/demo-2017-0007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Nagler, U. Schepsmeier, J. Stoeber, E.C. Brechmann, B. Graeler, T. Erhardt, C. Almeida, A. Min, C. Czado, M. Hofmann, M. Lilliches, H. Joe, T. Vatter, Tech. Rep., CRAN (2019) https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/VineCopula/index.html [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Yadav, V.K. Gupta, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, MAPAN 26 (2), 133–151 (2011) DOI: 10.1007/s12647-011-0014-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Azzalini, A. Capitanio, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 61 (3), 579–602 (1999) DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00194 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Azzalini, Tech. Rep., CRAN (2019) https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sn/index.html [Google Scholar]
  32. V. Ramnath, MAPAN 34 (3), 387–402 (2019) DOI: 10.1007/s12647-019-00324-w [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Ghasemi, S. Zahediasl, Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 10 (2), 486–9 (2012) DOI: 10.5815/ijem.3505 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. K.V. Mardia, Biometrika 57 (3), 519–30 (1970) DOI: 10.1093/biomet/57.3.519 [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Korkmaz, D. Goksuluk, G. Zararsiz, Tech. Rep., CRAN (2019) https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MVN/index.html [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.