Open Access
Table 5
Interpretation of the HRs for model (11), by USP types.
| Probe-a | |
|---|---|
| HR estimate | HR interpretation |
| 0.9010 | (0.9010–1) × 100 = −9.90% |
| → the risk of c1 failure versus c4 failure is −9.90% lower | |
| 2.3210 | (2.3210–1) × 100 = 132% |
| → the risk of c2 failure versus c4 failure is 132% higher | |
| 0.3090 | (0.3090–1) × 100 = −69.10% |
| → the risk of c3 failure versus c4 failure is −69.10% lower |
| Probe-b | |
|---|---|
| HR estimate | HR interpretation |
| 0.0200 | (0.0200) × 100 = −98.00% |
| → the risk of c1 failure versus c4 failure is −98% lower | |
| 1.7140 | (1.7140–1) × 100 = 71.40% |
| → the risk of c2 failure versus c4 failure is 71.40% higher | |
| 0.1430 | (0.1430–1) × 100 = −85.70% |
| → the risk of c3 failure versus c4 failure is −85.70% lower |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.