Issue |
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 7, Number 4, 2016
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 402 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2016016 | |
Published online | 25 October 2016 |
A meta model-based methodology for an energy savings uncertainty assessment of building retrofitting
1
CEREMA,
23 av. de l'Amiral Chauvin BP 20069,
49136
Les Ponts de Ce Cedex, France
2
SOLAMEN,
13 rue Dobre,
44100
Nantes, France
3
CSTB,
84 avenue Jean Jaures − Champs sur Marne,
77447
Marne la Vallee Cedex 2, France
⁎ Corresponding author: Antoine.caucheteux@cerema.fr
Received:
26
April
2016
Accepted:
13
September
2016
To reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy retrofitting of building stock presents significant potential for energy savings. In the design stage, energy savings are usually assessed through Building Energy Simulation (BES). The main difficulty is to first assess the energy efficiency of the existing buildings, in other words, to calibrate the model. As calibration is an under determined problem, there is many solutions for building representation in simulation tools. In this paper, a method is proposed to assess not only energy savings but also their uncertainty. Meta models, using experimental designs, are used to identify many acceptable calibrations: sets of parameters that provide the most accurate representation of the building are retained to calculate energy savings. The method was applied on an existing office building modeled with the TRNsys BES. The meta model, using 13 parameters, is built with no more than 105 simulations. The evaluation of the meta model on thousands of new simulations gives a normalized mean bias error between the meta model and BES of <4%. Energy savings are assessed based on six energy savings concepts, which indicate savings of 2–45% with a standard deviation ranging between 1.3% and 2.5%.
Key words: energy savings assessment / energy retrofitting / calibration / uncertainty analysis / building energy simulation / experimental design
© EDP Sciences, 2016
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.