Issue |
Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng.
Volume 2, Number 1, 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 31 - 38 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2011006 | |
Published online | 29 June 2011 |
Visual inspection of products: a comparison of the methods used to evaluate surface anomalies
Universitéde Savoie, Laboratoire SYMME, Annecy, France
⋆ Correspondence: nathalie.baudet@univ-savoie.fr
⋆⋆ Correspondence: maurice.pillet@univ-savoie.fr
⋆⋆⋆ Correspondence: jean-luc.maire@univ-savoie.fr
Received: 28 February 2011
Accepted: 3 March 2011
This paper presents and compares different approaches currently used to assess surface anomalies identified on a product. The common point between these methods is that they are based on a document presented in the form of a table, which is to help the inspector to assess the anomaly detected in a repeatable and reproducible way. We will present three types of table: criteria/level table, tree-like presentation table and an indexed table. As each of these tables presents certain limits when applied to the inspection of a product surface, we will describe the table proposed in order to help the inspector determine the intensity to attribute to the identified anomaly.
Key words: Surface anomaly / visual inspection / evaluation table / sensorial analysis
© EDP Sciences 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.